Tuesday, November 24, 2009

0.01% and Reality

Bill Gross (PIMCO) is musing about how bad it is to earn 0.01% on his Money Market accounts and suggests placing his riskless money into Utilities…

http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2009/Dec+Gross+Anything+but+01.htm

He talks about how the designs of the Fed are to keep Interest Rates so low that they force you to move your money into risky assets.

“The Fed is trying to reflate the U.S. economy. The process of reflation involves lowering short-term rates to such a painful level that investors are forced or enticed to term out their short-term cash into higher-risk bonds or stocks. Once your cash has recapitalized and revitalized corporate America and homeowners, well, then the Fed will start to be concerned about inflation – not until.”

I think the key issue will be when your Purchasing Power is getting ravaged by Inflation, then you will have to do something to protect yourself. But, with Inflation at effectively Zero, there isn’t much cost to staying in Cash, if your overall goal is to keep your money SAFE.

One Month US Treasury Bill yields actually went negative last week and the Three Month Yields were even worse. So are people really buying US Treasuries, even as the Fed tries to force people to put their money into riskier assets?

You bet they are. FDIC Insured balances (Money Market Funds) actually increased about $400 billion last month.


Why? Because they don’t trust the number reported by the Government and Wall Street. They want to know that they still have money and will worry about Inflation after they actually see it.

Morgan Stanley is telling you that the Yield on the 10-Year US Treasury will pop 2.20% higher next year. I am guessing that there is not a chance in **** that Rates will rise that far, because if they do, then housing prices collapse again. If TBT breaks out, then I will change my opinions and change my allocations…

http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/11/morgan-stanley-expects-10-year-yields-to-rise-220-bps-in-2010.html

This weekend, two Fed officials talked about extending the Fed’s programs to buy mortgages beyond their current expiration date of March 2010. This is their vehicle for capping Interest Rates. Do you think they want Rates to go higher or lower?

If rates will be capped, then there are a lot of investors who would rather buy guaranteed safety and forgo the extra percent or two they could get by taking what may be substantial risk.

Money printing to keep Interest Rates down = good fundamentals for Gold…

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Wells Fargo and FHA "Guarantees"

Over the last 18 months I complained a lot about how the decisions of policy makers we designed to move a lot of worthless debt from the balance sheets of the banks to the balance sheet of the US Taxpayer. Wells Fargo pretty much now embodies the consequences of what I was said would occur.

http://us1.institutionalriskanalytics.com/pub/IRAMain.asp

“Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE:WFC), in its most recent 10-Q, discloses that it need not bring on balance sheet ANY of the $1.1 trillion in conforming residential OBS exposures that are the subject of the new FASB rule eliminating the "Qualified Special Purpose Entity" designation. Why? Because the loans inside these securitization vehicles are insured by FHA, so goes the thinking of WFC and its auditor, thus the bank has no liability to these entities or the securities they have issued to investors. Pretty neat trick, eh?”

You read that right, because Wells Fargo knows that the US Taxpayer will clean up their mess (via the FHA), they think it is okay to not even bother discussing $1.1 TRILLION in mortgages they originated and OWN! Why? Because they figure, how can you take losses on something that is guaranteed by the US Taxpayer?

How stupid are we? Why do we put up with this stuff? When is one of these SOBs going to go to jail?

As of last week, 17.71% of all FHA mortgages are in default. 8.52% are more than 90-days delinquent.

Do the math - Wells Fargo has $1.1 Trillion of Mortgages off the books and another $700 Billion of Mortgages on the books. At an 8.5% default rate, that means they should be reserving about $153 billion for future losses. That would make Wells Fargo bankrupt. They are telling all who will listen that $93.5 billion in losses are going directly to the US Taxpayer!

Bank of America (think Countrywide) also has tons of these toxic Mortgages on their books and they are carrying these loans at artificially high values too.

Think of all the other smaller banks that aren’t reserving for the real losses in these FHA mortgages…

When the FASB got rid of “marked to market” accounting, they bought the banks and the Central Banks of Asia and Europe enough time to unload Trillions of Dollars of worthless mortgages onto the balance sheet of the US Taxpayer – via Agencies (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA) and the FRBNY.

Now the Fed is saying that buying $1.25 Trillion in Mortgages is not enough and that is would be a good idea to have the US Taxpayer buy still more of this toxic waste.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/34101180



But we can’t audit the Fed, because it needs to remain “independent”…

Do you wonder why I keep buying Gold?

Friday, November 20, 2009

Fed "Independence"

A quick note on this topic -

The only thing the Fed is independent of is oversight from those who fund it.
If you think that the Fed is independent from the banks who use it to fund their speculation and clean up their messes, then you are either not paying attention or are bought and paid for by these same banks (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd or a CNBC anchor).

Why Is The T-Bill Yield Negative?

The yield on the 1-month T-Bill went negative yesterday.
The yield of the 3-month T-Bill slipped below that of the 1-month - an invested yield curve. Yikes…

There is a lot of speculation as to why this occurred. Here are my two cents –

Bearish
Ukrainian Railway defaulted on a bond payment on non-government guaranteed debt. There is speculation that it will now default on a note guaranteed by the Ukrainian Government.

The Bearish camp would say that there is a new panic forming and investors are willing to pay the Fed to find safety in Treasuries.

If things are so bearish and a new panic is setting in, then why was LIBOR actually DOWN yesterday?

Bullish
The Dollar Carry Trade is in full force. The trade is that you buy US Treasuries and leverage the hell out of them. Your cost to borrow is the yield on the security you are leveraging. With a negative yield, you are now actually GETTING PAID to borrow Treasuries and hold them to maturity.

The Bullish camp would say that Treasury yields are now negative because so many people want to borrow them that they are driving the yield negative. Bond Price Up = Bond Yield Down

I tend to be more in the Bullish camp and think that people are loading up on leverage for one last speculative push into Year End 2009.

The fact that the Carry trade may be so crowded that T-Bill Yields are now negative may be a good indicator that prices will reverse soon (the law of large numbers and all), so be on your toes. Everything still needs to be a trade.

We’ll see how things shake out, but I am looking to buy stuff with the money I raise by selling SLV and HL earlier this week, not sell more stuff to raise more cash.

I will be posting a lot of charts this weekend.

Do You Really Think These Students Will Put Your Social Security Above Their Cost Of Living Expenses?

UC Regents voted to raise fees by 32% yesterday.
They cast the vote at UCLA.
A lot of students showed up to protest.

“We weren’t allowed to leave,” said Student Regent Jesse Bernal. “(The situation) just became a little too intense for the police officers.”

They took over a building.

http://www.dailybruin.com/articles/2009/11/20/uc-students-take-over-campbell-hall-defiance/

They held signs like -

Bailout Education
First (crossed out) Last Gen College Student

There is no way that the kids hit college today will pay for the Retirement (Social Security and Public Pensions) or Health Care (Medicare). They will have to figure out how to pay for their own lives on incomes that will not match what their parents made.

You better be planning on how to self-finance your retirement years, because those checks you were expecting from the Government will be a lot smaller than you thought, if they show up at all.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Nice Day Today

Today was a great day. It felt like NASDAQ 1999 – “heyidiot.com 2.0”... This is a glorious Commodity Bull Market.

I’ve been working since 5 am. I knew this would be a busy week and I wanted to make sure that I was ready for it. Most of my preparation for this week was done last week, when I bought gold stocks (NEM, ABX, RGLD), Silver (SLV) and Natural Gas (UNG).

The Dollar keeps imploding and virtually anything else with potential risk goes higher. So my logic is that if prices are moving up because the Dollar is going down, then why not own the pure plays that benefit most from a falling US Dollar.

Silver (SLV) pulled back into the 50-day and then exploded higher today.

Natural Gas (UNG) has been THE lagging Commodity. I have been watching it for months, waiting for a potential entry point. It looks like UNG is trying to put in a Double Bottom at $9. There is a big divergence between Price and Momentum (Green Line). UNG had a nice pop today.

Hecla Mining (HL) is a riskier Gold stock. It has been leading and broke out last week. I have tracked it for some time and got paid off huge today. Again, very 1999 tech-like.

Singapore (EWS) has been holding up like a champ, simply building new bases each time the markets pull back. Another nice move today.

Industrials have been in a multi-week base and finally started to break out today.

There were lots of breakouts and now I go to work looking for the next round of potential breakouts. Again, I want to only buy when I have an exit strategy. Look at what is again showing up –

Metals and Mining (XME). Does this remind you of the chart of XLI? It should.



Russia (RSX)


I refuse to chase price higher and buy when the markets are extended. I prefer to do more homework and find other setups that can be bought with reasonable risk.

If you have not participated in this leg, don’t get antsy and do something risky. Do you homework and look for the newly emerging potential setups.

Friday, November 13, 2009

529 Plans and Risk Management

The last few years, 529 Plans became a preferred method for financing college. They offered the ability to have money growing in a tax-advantaged fashion for children and grand children. I never bought one for my kids and I never sold one to a client. Never.

Mark Boucher’s story in his book “The Hedge Fund Edge” always stuck in the front of my brain -

“Recounting a personal experience may be the best way to explain why risk should be of paramount importance to investors. In the early 1970’s, when I was nine years old, my father died of cancer. He had struggled to try and leave me a trust fund with enough money to finance my future college education. Since I had at least a decade to go until reaching college age when my father set up the trust, he put it into stock funds managed by a bank.

From the end of World War II to the late 1960’s, stocks had been in a wonderfully profitable bull market. The public was participating in stocks to the highest degree since 1929, and the prevailing wisdom was that if one just hung onto stocks over the long run, they showed a better return than nearly any other type of asset. (This type of environment should sound familiar to investors of the late 1990’s (and again in the late 2000’s)).

Things did not go according to plan beginning in 1972. From 1972 to 1975, the value of that trust fund declined by over 70 percent along with the decline in U.S. and global stock prices of a commensurate amount (the S&P and Dow dropped by around 50% during the period, but the broader market dropped by much more than that). By the time I started college in the early 1980’s, even the blue chip indexes had lost more than 70 percent of their 1972 value in after-inflation terms.

While my trust had recovered somewhat from 1975 to the early 1980’s, it was nowhere near the level it had been before my father died. In the early 1970’s, he believed he had provided enough funds for me to go to an Ivy League school – but a decade later, the diminished trust led me to opt for UC Berkeley instead. In no way could the trust have covered the cost of an elite private school.”

My concern with 529 Plans is that if you are using them to finance the education of young kids, then the plans will be extremely aggressively invested. They will own lots of Small Stocks and International Stocks. These are extremely volatile asset classes. So if you have young children and you fund this plan, and the markets tank, you have no method for managing the risk in the account. They buy risky stocks and you are along for the ride.

As the child ages, these plans sell stocks and buy bonds. So if your child is near age 18, then you can’t buy stocks if you want, because the plan will force you into bonds. Then you can’t play offense if you want to.

So the worst case scenario would be that you have a young kid and the markets tank and sit around for a few years. Then the markets rally, but by then your accounts are in bonds and you do not participate…

Now the media is picking up on the topic –

http://www.citytowninfo.com/career-and-education-news/articles/families-exploring-new-college-savings-options-09111101

“Families whose 529 college savings plans took a beating last year are now looking into safer ways to save for higher education. As a result, banks and financial advisers are beginning to offer more conservative college savings options.”

There is a method top my madness. I sold my house in 2005 (I am trying to buy it back right now at a 49% discount to my sale price – holy cow). I stayed up nights in 2007 reading Money Market Fund Prospectuses to make sure that the funds clients owned had no holdings in Lehman or Bear Stearns. I avoided Corporate Bonds and sold my stocks in early 2008. I avoided 529 Plans because of lack of control. I started buying Gold, long before you were hearing about it on CNBC.

I am humble in the face of the market. If prices fall, I am wrong and I try to get out quickly. If prices go up, then I try to add to what is working. Markets lead. I follow.

I’m a top down kind of guy – is the market going up? Then I am interesting.
Which Sectors have the most strength? Which Industry Groups are getting the focus of buying from the big boys?
Which stocks have the characteristics of the great leading stocks of the past?
Is there a point on the chart where I can buy then, know I have a good chance at success and still have an exit strategy if prices start falling?

The rules set up by the likes of William O’Neil work. Is it a matter having the discipline to follow them and the expertise to customize portfolios to potential risk.

My goal is to manage risk. I define risk as falling prices and falling purchasing power via Inflation and a falling US Dollar. I will make money when the gettin’ is good and then hide when the stuff hits the fan.

I think others are making promises of returns that are not possible or are being achieved at undisclosed risks. I think that selling products like 529 Plans, illiquid Limited Partnerships or Bond Funds that are loaded up on Mortgages and Bank Bonds is unconscionable. The stuff will hit the fan again and you had better have the ability to play defense – because the next unwind will make 2008 look like a picnic.